Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  163 / 234 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 163 / 234 Next Page
Page Background

159

Chapter 9: Environment and the Economy

exports is intimately linked to environmental quality and

sustainability. National economic growth and success is

inextricably linked to environmental sustainability and we

have to strive for carbon neutrality to remain sustainably

competitive.

Conclusions and Outlook

Sustainable competitiveness should be at the heart of

thinking about sustainability. This is because competitive

economies tend to be more innovative, more resilient

and better able to respond to external shocks and,

therefore, maintain high levels of prosperity into the future.

A 2015 report by a group of experts convened by the EU

Commission provides advice in the form of a roadmap

for systemic eco-innovation to achieve a low-carbon

circular economy; the report concluded that the economic

challenges currently facing Europe are not cyclical, but

of a structural nature (EC, 2015). The report added that

European production and consumption practices and

expectations are not equipped to face a global climate of

slow demand growth and resource volatility, commenting

that “without change the EU will become inevitably less

competitive, less attractive, and less economically viable”.

Growing population, the competition for diminishing

resources, the appropriate recognition of ecosystem

services and natural capital, as well as the adaptive

challenges arising from our changing climate and our

national climate change commitments will, over the

next 30 years, require ambitious social and economic

interventions and responses. The emerging consensus is

now focusing around the need to put economies on a

more sustainable footing, resulting in a resource-efficient,

carbon-neutral, circular economy. This will require an

all-of-society response: essentially we have to rethink,

and redesign what we mean by social and economic

‘prosperity’ in order to deliver the resilience essential

for us to prevail. We must all learn to live, produce and

consume within the physical and biological limits of

the planet. To achieve this will require integrated and

enduring governance, including brave social and economic

measures. Ireland’s economy needs to strive for sustainable

competitiveness, which the World Economic Forum defines

as the set of institutions, policies and factors that make

a nation productive over the longer term while ensuring

social and environmental sustainability. We cannot

necessarily wait for regulatory intervention to change;

non-state actors are already leading and coalescing

around goals and ideals to progress climate change and

sustainability agendas.

The EU Commission’s 2016 winter forecast bulletin notes

that the European economy is now entering its fourth

year of recovery, and growth continues at a moderate

rate, driven mainly by private consumption. In Ireland this

growth is predicted to be between 3% and 4% in 2016

and 2017. Without market-wide eco-labelling and life

cycle analysis for consumer products and services, it is not

possible to determine the sustainability of this growth.

We know from previous national statistics that excessive

consumption can lead to significant wastefulness and

other environmental burdens. The EU’s Eurobarometer

survey of environmental attitudes notes that 94% of Irish

people rate protection of the environment as fairly or very

important, and 96% agree that they can play a role in

protecting the environment.

22

The governance challenge is

to realise these declared intentions in displayed behaviours.

The State must consider market interventions and other

policy instruments that correct market failures, and

also both direct and where possible “nudge” (through

elective and, in time, normalised value-based decisions)

consumption and production behaviours towards a more

sustainable outcome.

Our conventional measures of prosperity (e.g. gross

national product, GDP, value added) are of limited use in

that they do not factor in elements such as environmental

quality, social wellbeing, ecosystem services and drawdown

of natural capital into any measure of economic and social

progress and sustainability.

References

Bullock, C., and Hawe, J., 2014.

The Natural Capital Values

of Ireland’s Native Woodland

. Woodlands of Ireland, Dublin.

Ciscar, J.C., Feyen, L., Soria, A.

et al

., 2014.

Climate

Impacts in Europe

. Results from the JRC PESETA II Project.

JRC Scientific and Political Reports, EUR 26586EN.

Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

DECLG (Department of Environment, Community and

Local Government), 2008.

The Economic and Social

Aspects of Biodiversity – Benefits and Costs of Biodiversity

in Ireland

. DECLG, Dublin. Available online:

www.cbd.int/ doc/case-studies/inc/cs-inc-ireland-en.pdf

(accessed July

2016)

DECLG (Department of the Environment, Community

and Local Government), 2012.

Our Sustainable Future.

a Framework for Sustainable Development for Ireland.

DECLG, Dublin. Available online:

www.housing.gov. ie/environment/sustainable-development/policy/our- sustainable-future-framework-sustainable-development

(accessed July 2016)

22

www.ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_fact_ie_en.pdf