Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  205 / 234 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 205 / 234 Next Page
Page Background

201

Measuring progress in agricultural sustainability is

difficult. Dillon

et al

. (2016) developed a series of farm

level sustainability indicators using information from

the National Farm Survey data and looking at three

dimensions: environmental sustainability (relating to GHGs

and nitrogen use), economic sustainability and social

sustainability. While this approach and the creation of the

Food Wise 2025 Environmental Sustainability Committee

have promise in assisting to ensure the environmental

sustainability of agriculture, the regional and local variation

in the physical setting as highlighted by the ACP and EPA

characterisation work indicate the complexity in achieving

sustainable intensification. When considering this in the

context of the knowledge and practice transfer issues

highlighted by the AgImpact project and Origin Green,

it is clear that the interplay between the two strands of

research will require attention in the immediate future. In

addressing this issue, Dillon

et al

. (2016) noted that ‘There

is a growing recognition of the need for interconnected

policy in the area of sustainability’. It is clear that

addressing these interplays will be a key challenge for

farmers, public bodies, and agricultural and environmental

policy-makers in the coming years.

Innovation

There have been a number of positive innovations

to support the sustainable development of the

agricultural sector.

Recent years have seen a number of positive innovations

to support the sustainable development of the agricultural

sector. PastureBase Ireland

16

is a citizen science enabled

system into which farmers provide data on grass growth

from their farms, which facilitates the quantification of

grass growth in a range of biophysical environments.

PastureBase then provides feedback that can be used by

farmers to support day-to-day management decisions to

improve production efficiency (getting more from less)

or to evaluate longer-term performance from the farm.

The Teagasc-Bord Bia Carbon Navigator tool referred to

previously represents a pro-active approach to addressing

resource efficiency. The newly developed Nutrient

Management Planning (NMP) Online system has the

potential to assist with the management of soil fertility

and may allow for the tracking of spatial and temporal

changes in it. Coupling NMP online with other productivity

efficiency tools may help farmers to improve productivity

while protecting water quality.

The

Teagasc Technology Foresight 2035

report (Teagasc,

2016) identified the potential contribution of the

converging ICT technologies that can provide new, more

cost-effective, integrated and streamlined systems at

all levels in the agricultural value chain. New and larger

16

https://www.teagasc.ie/crops/grassland/pasturebase-ireland/

datasets are now and will increasingly be collected using

affordable sensor technologies that will be employed at

farm level. The risks inherent in addressing and managing

all the production and environmental resources can be

significantly reduced when data are used to inform the

decision making at all stakeholder levels. Substantial

datasets are being collated via EPA work on catchment

characterisation and via PastureBase, NMP online, ACP

and other initiatives. Clearly future data sharing and

management will be a key support to environmental

protection in the context of agriculture.

Conclusion and Future

Challenges

The quality of Ireland’s environment plays a vital role

in the quality of Ireland’s agricultural produce and its

marketing. It is essential to ensure the implementation of

the Food Wise strategy does not result in damage to the

environment and supports progressive improvement where

it is already impacted. Food Wise recognises this and its

vision of economic competitiveness and environmental

sustainability being equal pillars is a significant step

towards dealing with the tensions that can exist between

environmental goals and socio-economic ones. Addressing

these tensions will require a strong, reliable and

independent evidence base upon which all stakeholders

involved in environmental protection and agriculture

development and management can depend and upon

which actions can be developed and implemented. Better

information and more evidence are being delivered on

the interactions between agriculture, its productivity and

its consequences on the environment via research and

other channels. There is however a challenge in improving

the sharing of this information and more importantly

developing a common understanding of the interactions

between agricultural management choices and their

effects on the environment and the measures on how to

address them.

Chapter 12: Environment and Agriculture